No paye live sex chat
The crap that we mothers have to put up with because of vindictive, twisted ex partners is horrendous.I should be the one on sickness benefit, he gave me a breakdown. I wouldn’t be so quick to discount suicidal thoughts.The casual reversal of that most fundamental of legal principles , the burden of proof, suggests that the CSA has occasionally behaved more like the secret police in a dictatorship than the arm of a parliamentary democracy.And clearly the Court of Appeal found the arguments convincing.Mothers get away with murder when flouting contact orders.My ex owes me thousands of hours of contact time, yet there isn’t even a whiff of interest or concern from the ‘authorities’.Article 6 protects the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time frame, the presumption of innocence until guilt is proven and similar legal rights.
They couldn’t have been more dismissive, almost laughing in my face with smug comments about ‘cannot touch the mother’.
The CSA claims that Mr Karoonian owes more than £10,000 in child maintenance arrears but he denies this.
Amongst other criticisms, Lord Justice Ward said the wording of court summons sent to the two men had wrongly implied that they bore responsibility for proving that they did not owe the money claimed, thereby reversing the traditional legal burden of proof, when it is up to the accuser to prove their claims.
Yet the hugely discreditable CSA will hunt down a man for every penny they, usually erroneously, think he should owe.
A hugely destructive course of conduct ruining businesses, livelihoods and relationships.